27 October 2023
Modernism has been productively destabilized in recent years, leading Paul K. Saint-Amour to claim that the masculinist model of “make it new” verges on a kind of “cartoon vitalism.” As he writes, “equating modernism with […] muscular idol smashing and warrior masculinity misses both the traditionalism of the strong and the dissidence of the weak.”[1] If weakness has become a new operative term in our understanding of modernist aesthetics, practice, and pedagogy—as the high traction of Saint-Amour’s article suggests it continues to be—it is high time to consider the resonance of precarity as another, if not-quite synonymous qualifier. Indeed, the “dissidence of the weak” can equally refer to the efforts of precarious modernists—including those working and writing along intersecting lines of racial, class, and gender disenfranchisement—and it also calls attention to the precarity of modernism as an academic discipline. Consider the unfortunate dearth of hiring in literary modernism or adjacent specialties. This, and the related shortcomings of the neoliberal University, forces us to acknowledge that a vast majority of modernist scholarship today comes not from the tenured or the institutionally secure, but rather from the realm of the precarious: graduate students, contingent faculty members, independent scholars, and all those whose own, tenuous belonging to the field mirrors the precarity of the figures we study. Perhaps this was always the case, but recent global developments nonetheless shine a light on its current salience. Across the U.K., higher education has seen widespread strike action, while graduate students across the U.S. have been fighting to unionize for better research and teaching conditions. Just last month, West Virginia University voted to make wide-ranging reductions to academic programs and faculty positions, including the entire world language department, a crisis that, as Rose Casey, Jessica Wilkerson, and Johanna Winant suggest, spells disaster for the future of public education. This is not just an academic problem, they caution, for “people are the heart of the public University, and the public University is the heart of American democracy.”
Continue reading “The Modernist Review #49: Precarious Modernisms”